The not so sweet truth about red
tomatoes.
Alexander
Anaya Ashe
American
InterContinental University
2/19/2016
The not so sweet truth about red
tomatoes.
- Purpose
- Are tomatoes sweetness affected by the green chloroplasts in the fruits?
- Introduction
- Plants
are green because of the light being reflected by the chlorophyll
pigments inside of chloroplasts. It is these chloroplasts that capture
photons from the suns light energy and through the process of
photosynthesis turn those photons into glucose. (Editorial Board [EB],
2016, p. 49). Tomatoes originally had green shoulders and where reported
to be sweeter. Over the years farmers have cross bred tomatoes to be a uniform
red color for aesthetic and harvesting reasons.
“Studies from the University of California, Davis, found that tomatoes need the correct version of a particular gene (one called SlGLK2) to form chloroplasts properly in the fruit.” (Kawok, 2012, para. 5).
The tomatoes without green shoulders are the ones that have been bred to have the wrong version of this SlGLK2 gene which results in smaller and fewer chloroplasts. - Hypothesis or Predicted Outcome
- I hypothesize that the modified tomatoes are less sweet because of their inability to create a surplus of glucose as a result of having fewer and smaller chloroplasts than those of natural tomatoes and that a restoration of the S1GLK2 gene will in fact result in sweeter tasting tomatoes.
- Methods
2 variations
of tomatoes plants are grown in a completely controlled environment;
(A) Genetically modified
to have S1GLK2,
(B) Tomato plant without
S1GLK2,
3 of each variation of tomato plant are
grown simultaneously in individual controlled environments with no variables
other than the tomato plants themselves. Glucose measurement takes place at 30,
45, and 60 days of growth for each plant. Glucose measurement takes place by
choosing tomatoes from the same location on each plant which are then blended and
the glucose levels measured.
- Results
or Outcome
Key:
(A) Genetically
modified to have S1GLK2
(B) Tomato
plant without S1GLK2
|
Trial 1
A/B Glucose Level |
Trial 2
A/B Glucose Level |
Trial 3
A/B Glucose Level |
Average
A/B Glucose Level |
Days of Growth
|
|
|
|
|
30days
|
20 / 18
|
21 / 18
|
20 / 18
|
20 / 18
|
45 days
|
28 / 25
|
30 / 26
|
29 / 26
|
29 / 26
|
60 days
|
46 / 30
|
47 / 30
|
47 / 30
|
47 /30
|
Tomato plants (A) on day 30 produced 20, 21, and 20 Glucose
Levels [GL] resulting in an average production of 20 GL during the 3 trial
study. Tomato plants (B) on day 30 produced 18 GL, 18 GL, and 18 GL resulting
in an average production of 18 GL during the 3 trial study.
Tomato plants (A) on day 45 produced 28 GL, 30 GL, and 29 GL,
resulting in an average production of 29 GL during the 3 trial study. Tomato
plants (B) on day 45 produced 25 GL, 26 GL, and 26 GL resulting in an average
production of 26 GL during the 3 trial study.
Tomato plants (A) on day 60 produced 46 GL, 47 GL, and 47 GL,
resulting in an average production of 47 GL during the 3 trial study. Tomato
plants (B) on day 60 produced 30 GL, 30 GL, and 30 GL resulting in an average
production of 26 GL during the 3 trial study.
Discussion and Analysis
Data collected during the experiment lead me to conclude that
my hypothesis was correct that the tomato plants with the correct S1GLK2 gene
would produce fruits with a higher glucose level than that of the plants
without the gene.
If I was to continue the experiment I would perform it again in a manner that I could determine how many chloroplasts each tomato has to give better understanding on the exact nature of the S1GLK2 gene.
If I was to continue the experiment I would perform it again in a manner that I could determine how many chloroplasts each tomato has to give better understanding on the exact nature of the S1GLK2 gene.
References
Kwok, A. (2012).
Tomatoes tasteless green gene. Student Science. Retrieved
Kupaferschmidt,
K. (2012). How tomatoes lost their taste. Science. Retrieved
Editorial Board (2016). Biology. Words of Wisdom. Retrieved
from
https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781934920602/cfi/60!/4/4@0.00:0.00
No comments:
Post a Comment